Study programme changes

I think that our discipline seems like a perfect one (and really it is very attractive), but in the deep it  has many problems that we can only see in a retrospective analysis, because it is necessary to understand that this analysys has several layers. For example, in this moment I think that we need more subjects that imply more hours to understand our discipline from the practice, especially in the first years. Another one, it would be neccesary to implement more reading from female writers, because the male authors are the majority, in special the obligatory ones, that imply biased learning from our subjects. Even though I must assume that our career is one of the privileged ones compared with the other careers in the faculty of social science. Compared, for example, with anthropology. 

The curriculum in general is one of the best, but it is necessary to update it, incidentally because of the struggles of the feminist movement. 
Talking about the method, this is very appropriate. I think that is one of the best. And the technology is very appropriate, in special in those subjetcs that are more complicated, like English and statistics. The teaching method is enjoyable, and I like it too much.
To finish, I think it is necessary to be attentive and in a permanent dialogue with graduates and current students, to observe what is really happening with the passage of time. 
Also to listen to the different opinions that can be given by the teachers who are in charge of the different subjects, their observations and contributions. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My future job

My first post

English language challenges